THE INNER ATLASMy Shelf · 0
Menu
Library / Book / Science, History & Faith
Decorative; adjacent title and creator provide identity.Book

BOOK · L2 · INNER ATLAS REVIEWED

Can a Scientist Believe in Miracles?

2018; exact edition represented by linked catalog record where available

STARTING FRAMEChristian — physicist and apologetic philosophy
EXPLORESScience, History & Faith
ENGAGEMENT EFFORTModerate
HOW IT MAY HELPHelps orient

A LIBRARIAN’S ORIENTATION

What this book explores

MIT nuclear scientist Ian Hutchinson answers questions students commonly ask about Christianity, science, evidence, miracles, natural law, prayer, consciousness, Genesis, evolution, and the resurrection. Written in a conversational question-and-response form, the book argues that modern science does not require scientism and that belief in divine action can be intellectually responsible when miracles are understood as unusual acts of God rather than violations caused by ignorance.

EDITORIAL NOTE

Why it’s in the Library

Hutchinson gives travelers a clear example of how a practicing physicist defends orthodox Christian belief without rejecting scientific method. The format surfaces real objections and distinguishes science from broader philosophical claims sometimes made in its name. The Library includes it as accessible Christian apologetics from a scientist’s perspective—not as experimental verification of miracles, a representative account of all scientists, or an adjudication of historical and theological questions by scientific credentials.

Good starting place if…

You want concise answers from a Christian physicist about miracles, evidence, natural law, evolution, and whether scientific practice permits religious belief.

Know before you begin…

The book’s answers vary in domain: Hutchinson speaks with direct expertise about physics and scientific practice, but philosophy, biblical interpretation, history, consciousness, and miracle reports require other forms of expertise and evidence. Showing that science cannot rule out divine action is not the same as showing that a particular miracle occurred. His critique of scientism is important but should not become a shortcut around empirical scrutiny. Read competing philosophical and theological accounts alongside the apologetic case.