THE INNER ATLASMy Shelf · 0
Menu
Library / Book / Science, History & Faith
Decorative; adjacent title and creator provide identity.Book

BOOK · L2 · INNER ATLAS REVIEWED

The Language of Science and Faith

2011; exact edition represented by linked catalog record where available

STARTING FRAMEChristian — evolutionary creation
EXPLORESScience, History & Faith
ENGAGEMENT EFFORTApproachable
HOW IT MAY HELPA place to begin

A LIBRARIAN’S ORIENTATION

What this book explores

Physicist Karl Giberson and geneticist Francis Collins present an evangelical Christian case for accepting evolutionary science. They explain genetics, common ancestry, natural selection, human origins, scientific evidence, Genesis, Adam and Eve, suffering, and divine action while arguing that Scripture and science need not compete when each is interpreted responsibly. The book also responds directly to young-earth creationism and intelligent-design arguments.

EDITORIAL NOTE

Why it’s in the Library

This is a useful bridge for travelers taught that accepting evolution requires abandoning Christianity or biblical seriousness. It brings mainstream science into conversation with recognizably evangelical commitments rather than asking readers to cross every theological threshold at once. The Library includes it as a historically important compatibility argument and accessible scientific orientation—not as the only Christian model, a complete account of evolution, or proof that all tensions disappear once Genesis is read nonliterally.

Good starting place if…

You accept or are considering evolutionary science but need an accessible Christian framework for genetics, Genesis, human origins, suffering, and divine action.

Know before you begin…

The scientific consensus supporting evolution is much broader than the authors’ particular theological synthesis. Their harmonization depends on interpretive judgments about Scripture, providence, Adam and Eve, the image of God, death, and the fall that other Christians dispute. Scientific material should be updated through current sources, while theological claims remain theology rather than laboratory findings. Readers harmed by creationist conflict may still find apologetic framing activating, and accepting evolution need not require retaining evangelical premises.

KEEP EXPLORING

Connected with intention